SCOTUS Rules Against Unions in Janus Case

This is a great win for liberty, freedom, and the right to work. 

I do object to this wording from The Daily Beast:

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Tuesday that non-union workers who are nevertheless represented by a union for bargaining purposes cannot be required to pay union fees. Janus v. AFSCME hinged on the story of Mark Janus, a child-support specialist in Illinois who argued that he should not be forced to pay fees to his union.

First, he didn’t want to be represented by any union. He was forced to be. That’s what the case hinged on.

Second, it wasn’t his union.

The entire spin by The Daily Beast is evident.

SCOTUS Rules Against Unions in Janus Case

In a 5-4 decision.