Man who attacked ICE facility repeats Ocasio-Cortez’s rhetoric in manifesto
A man who recently attacked an ICE facility, could have been inspired by the rhetoric of New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
According to the attacker’s manifesto, which was released Monday, the man repeatedly used Ocasio-Cortez’s language. He called migrant detention centers “concentration camps” at least four times and endorsed John Brown, who staged an armed attack on a U.S. federal arsenal back in 1859.
Ryan Saavedra on Twitter
Here is the video where Ocasio-Cortez singlehandedly started the “concentration camps” lie about immigrant detention facilities. https://t.co/F2MmZ8y2dT
The attacker, identified in local media as 69-year-old Willem Van Spronsen, attempted to cause an explosion outside an ICE facility in Tacoma, Washington on Saturday. He was shot dead by authorities, and has since been designated as a domestic terrorist.
The man reportedly identified himself as a member of the left-wing extremist group know as Antifa. Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez has yet to condemn the attack even after being repeatedly asked for her input by the media.
The Rebel on Twitter
@AOC refuses to condemn the Antifa attack on the Tacoma ICE center; refuses to tell @TheRealKeean if her inflammatory comments about “concentration camps” radicalized the attacker. https://t.co/YOjn0yL032
President Trump: Far-left Democrats are actual racists
President Trump is taking a hardline stance on the accusations of racism against him. While talking to reporters in Washington, D.C. Monday, the president doubled down on his criticism of far-left Democrat congresswomen, which supposedly include Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
President Trump said they must apologize to America for their foul language and actual racism. He stressed that some of the far-left Democrats have endorsed anti-Semitism.
Donald J. Trump on Twitter
When will the Radical Left Congresswomen apologize to our Country, the people of Israel and even to the Office of the President, for the foul language they have used, and the terrible things they have said. So many people are angry at them & their horrible & disgusting actions!
The president said the squad of far-left Democrats originates from the most dysfunctional countries in the world, and yet has the nerve to attack the U.S. and its policies.
Democrats are planning a House resolution to condemn what they call the president’s “xenophobic” tweets.
President Trump: Far-left Democrats are actual racists
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 2:00 PM PT – Monday, July 15 , 2019 President Trump is taking a hardline stance on the accusations of racism against him. While talking to reporters in Washington, D.C. Monday, the president doubled down on his criticism of far-left Democrat congresswomen, which supposedly include Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
FBI, ICE use driver’s license photos for facial recognition tech
The FBI and ICE are reportedly using driver’s license photos for facial recognition without consent. According to reports Monday, the two agencies compiled a facial recognition database of millions of people living in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.
The database was designed to help law enforcement agencies battle crime and deport illegal aliens. However, some congressional Democrats say facial recognition could violate — what they call — the civil rights of illegals. Meanwhile, Republicans have raised privacy concerns.
And this:
“The GAO — not Jim Jordan, not Republicans — the GAO says that when you guys started this, you didn’t follow the ecommerce law, you didn’t do privacy assessment, you didn’t provide timely notice, you didn’t conduct proper testing, and didn’t check with the state system that you’re gonna interact with. So, that’s the back drop, that’s the framework.”
— Rep. Jim Jordan, (R) Ohio
FBI, ICE use driver’s license photos for facial recognition tech
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 1:21 PM PT – Monday, July 8, 2019 The FBI and ICE are reportedly using driver’s license photos for facial recognition without consent. According to reports Monday, the two agencies compiled a facial recognition database of millions of people living in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.
FBI, ICE use driver’s license photos for facial recognition tech
The FBI and ICE are reportedly using driver’s license photos for facial recognition without consent. According to reports Monday, the two agencies compiled a facial recognition database of millions of people living in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.
The database was designed to help law enforcement agencies battle crime and deport illegal aliens. However, some congressional Democrats say facial recognition could violate — what they call — the civil rights of illegals. Meanwhile, Republicans have raised privacy concerns.
And this:
“The GAO — not Jim Jordan, not Republicans — the GAO says that when you guys started this, you didn’t follow the ecommerce law, you didn’t do privacy assessment, you didn’t provide timely notice, you didn’t conduct proper testing, and didn’t check with the state system that you’re gonna interact with. So, that’s the back drop, that’s the framework.”
— Rep. Jim Jordan, (R) Ohio
FBI, ICE use driver’s license photos for facial recognition tech
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 1:21 PM PT – Monday, July 8, 2019 The FBI and ICE are reportedly using driver’s license photos for facial recognition without consent. According to reports Monday, the two agencies compiled a facial recognition database of millions of people living in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.
Calif. governor signs bill granting illegal immigrants health care
California has officially become the first state to offer health benefits to illegal immigrants, and it’s all on a taxpayer’s dime. State Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new bill into law on Tuesday that will grant taxpayer funded benefits to young adults eligible for the state’s Medicaid program.
Low income adults aged 25 or younger all qualify for this program regardless of immigration status. Most notably, California already covers children 18 years and younger despite legal merit.
According to state officials, about 90,000 people are expected to be covered by the new plan, but not without a cost. The move will reportedly cost approximately $98 million per year, with that expected to increase in the future.
Calif. governor signs bill granting illegal immigrants health care
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 8:57 AM PT – Wednesday, July 10, 2019 California has officially become the first state to offer health benefits to illegal immigrants, and it’s all on a taxpayer’s dime. State Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new bill into law on Tuesday that will grant taxpayer funded benefits to young adults eligible for the state’s Medicaid program.
Calif. teachers won’t notify parents if student leaves school for abortion
You can’t give them aspirin for a headache or a Claritin for clergies. But you can get them an abortion.
A leaked video from a meeting between the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the California Board of Education is depicting the controversial sex education reform efforts within the state.
The conservative group ‘Our Watch’ released the video in June, which shows ALCU staff attorney Ruth Dawson explaining how California teachers can help students obtain abortions without parental consent or knowledge.
Watch the full video here: The California Sex Ed Indoctrination
“Regardless of how old the student is, they can walk into a doctor’s office and consent to these services without parental consent,” she stated. “Those services are pregnancy and prenatal care, contraception and emergency contraception, abortion — and for these there is no parental notification.”
Dawson then explained how teachers and administrators are not allowed to mark a child absent or out for a medical procedure, and should, instead, record students with an “excused absence” if they leave school campus for an abortion or other sexual health-related procedures. These laws apply to children from kindergarten through 12th grade, who are all required to participate in the mandatory sexual education classes.
FBI, ICE use driver’s license photos for facial recognition tech
The FBI and ICE are reportedly using driver’s license photos for facial recognition without consent. According to reports Monday, the two agencies compiled a facial recognition database of millions of people living in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.
The database was designed to help law enforcement agencies battle crime and deport illegal aliens. However, some congressional Democrats say facial recognition could violate — what they call — the civil rights of illegals. Meanwhile, Republicans have raised privacy concerns.
And this:
“The GAO — not Jim Jordan, not Republicans — the GAO says that when you guys started this, you didn’t follow the ecommerce law, you didn’t do privacy assessment, you didn’t provide timely notice, you didn’t conduct proper testing, and didn’t check with the state system that you’re gonna interact with. So, that’s the back drop, that’s the framework.”
— Rep. Jim Jordan, (R) Ohio
FBI, ICE use driver’s license photos for facial recognition tech
OAN Newsroom UPDATED 1:21 PM PT – Monday, July 8, 2019 The FBI and ICE are reportedly using driver’s license photos for facial recognition without consent. According to reports Monday, the two agencies compiled a facial recognition database of millions of people living in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.
Man Hurls Molotov Cocktails At ICE Detention Center; Shot Dead By Police
A rifle-toting man throwing unspecified “incendiary devices” at a Tacoma, Washington ICE detention facility was shot dead by police on Saturday morning.
The man was identified by officials as 69-year-old Willem Van Spronsen of Vashon Island, who made headlines last year when he assaulted a police officer at a similar protest in an attempt to free another protester. He was found with a collapsible baton and a knife, leading to criminal charges according to the Seattle Times.
At approximately 4 a.m. Saturday morning Tacoma Police responded a call about an armed man outside the the privately run Northwest Detention Center. Police say Van Spronsen was tossing lit objects at vehicles and buildings, which set one car on fire. He is also said to have attempted to ignite a propane tank unsuccessfully.
According to Tacoma police spokeswoman Loretta Cool, officers reported “shots fired” and engaged Van Spronsen. It is unclear if he fired first, or fired at all. His death has been classified by the Pierce County Medical Examiner’s Office as a homicide.
The four male officers involved in the shooting were placed on paid administrative leave – a standard practice, until an investigation has been conducted.
Man Hurls Molotov Cocktails At ICE Detention Center; Shot Dead By Police
A rifle-toting man throwing unspecified “incendiary devices” at a Tacoma, Washington ICE detention facility was shot dead by police on Saturday morning. The man was identified by officials as 69-year-old Willem Van Spronsen of Vashon Island, who made headlines last year when he assaulted a police officer at a similar protest in an attempt to free another protester.
Watch Protesters Pull Down And Deface American Flag, Raise Mexican Flag At ICE Facility
A group of protesters upset with federal immigration roundups stormed the barriers near an Aurora, Colorado ICE facility Friday night, pulling down the American flag from its flagpole and replacing it with the Mexican flag. The protesters then defaced the American flag and raised it upside-down.
Matt Mauro on Twitter
Protestors on @ICEgov property just pulled down the American flag and replaced it with the Mexican flag. The group by the doors is growing. Though most protestors are still on the street. https://t.co/X2waaFMEOW
Mark Neitro on Twitter
Protesters raise and replace 3 flags over Aurora #ICE Processing Center. #immigration @CBSDenver #immigrationraids #immigrationrally
According to the Denver Post, the majority of protesters on the site were demonstrating peacefully, while “another group stormed the barriers near the building and pulled down an American flag off the flag pole in front of the facility and replaced it with a Mexican flag.”
Jaclyn Allen on Twitter
Police take down Mexican flag and defaced American flag outside ICE immigration facility. https://t.co/CfDmYDtzxv
“We want to close down the detention center, and we want them to release these immigrants to their families or sponsors,” protest organizer Patty Lampman told Westword.
Cities across the country have been preparing for anticipated federal raids aimed at detaining and deporting thousands of people who skipped out on their immigration hearings and are residing illegally within the United States.
And this:
Immigration reform advocates said that communities around Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York and San Francisco were being targeted by raids expected to start Sunday and last through at least Thursday.
“It’s almost like getting ready for a hurricane – it’s that state of alarm that people are feeling,” said Melissa Taveras of the Miami-based Florida Immigrant Coalition. “People are asking, ‘Is it OK for us to go work? Is it OK to take our kids to school?’”
Cities prepare for showdown with Trump over ICE raids: You ‘have to come through us’
CLOSE DENVER – Fear and anxiety spread through immigrant communities nationwide over anticipated federal raids aimed at detaining and deporting thousands of people accused of remaining illegally within the United States. Immigration reform advocates said that communities around Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York and San Francisco were being targeted by raids expected to start Sunday and last through at least Thursday.
Via
Watch Protesters Pull Down And Deface American Flag, Raise Mexican Flag At ICE Facility
A group of protesters upset with federal immigration roundups stormed the barriers near an Aurora, Colorado ICE facility Friday night, pulling down the American flag from its flagpole and replacing it with the Mexican flag. The protesters then defaced the American flag and raised it upside-down.
Speaker Pelosi claims Attorney General Barr lied before House
This is what happens when your confirmation bias is repudiated.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she will no longer address anything Attorney General William Barr has to say. She reportedly believes the attorney general lied to Congress, prompting her latest comments.
Pelosi’s remarks are allegedly in response to Barr’s April testimony before the House Appropriations Committee. Democrat Congressman Charlie Crist asked the attorney general whether he was aware that Mueller’s team was frustrated with Barr’s summary of the report.
BREAKING: Here is the full Barr-Crist exchange from April 9th in full context. Barr answers the question and goes on to summarize the Mueller letter. Pelosi is accusing Barr of lying by editing his comments pic.twitter.com/UlLvdA6ZnM
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) May 2, 2019
His View: No One Is a Climate Change Denier, Part 2
My second column on Climate Change Denial ran in today’s Moscow-Pullman Daily News. Enjoy!
I appreciate the interaction concerning the Anthropogenic
Global Warming (AGW) hypothesis. This hypothesis assumes that human
activity is completely responsible for all warming that we experience today. As
with any scientific hypothesis, the burden lies with AGW proponents to
demonstrate that their models fit reality, and I will demonstrate that they do
not.First, as I noted in my previous column (No
one is a climate change denier), all agree that the climate has changed for millennia and is still changing. Around 1850, before the first drop of oil was pumped out of the ground, the 500-year Little Ice Age ended and the earth started another warming phase that continues today.Second, modern climate scientists and their models cannot
explain any climate shifts prior to 1950. How does natural climate variation affect
the climate change we experience today? Climate alarmists say that starting in
1950, all climate change is man-made. That is an assertion without proof that strains
credulity.In 1988, NASA scientist James E. Hansen testified before the
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and made dire predictions
based on the AGW computer models. In 2018, The
Wall Street Journal ran an article (Thirty Years On, How Well Do
Global Warming Predictions Stand Up?) analyzing those predictions and concluding that the models do not work: “Surface temperatures are behaving as if we had capped 18 years ago the carbon-dioxide emissions responsible for the enhanced greenhouse effect. But we didn’t. And it isn’t just Mr. Hansen who got it wrong. Models devised by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have, on average, predicted about twice as much warming as has been observed since global satellite temperature monitoring began 40 years ago.”Further untrustworthiness of climate models is seen in their
absurd predictions:·
By 2000: global warming would cause seas
to rise, wiping nations off the map·
In 2007: global warming would cause fewer
hurricanes and fewer tornadoes·
By 2009: the Himalayan glaciers would be
gone·
In 2012: global warming would cause more
hurricanes and more tornadoes·
By 2013: the Arctic would be ice free·
By 2018: snow would be a thing of the past·
By 2020: the glaciers in Glacier National
Park would be goneThese are just a few of the blatantly false and
contradictory climate predictions offered by their computer models.Over nine thousand PhD scientists have signed a petition disagreeing with the AGW hypothesis. Wikipedia lists the prominent ones. Some question the accuracy of the projections; some argue that natural processes primarily cause global warming; others argue that the cause of global warming is unknown; and finally, some say that global warming will have few negative consequences.
Third, one of my biggest gripes with the AGW crowd is that if
you do not completely accept their theory, you are a “denier,” a word purposely
chosen to equate us with Holocaust deniers. Here their claims shift from
scientific to political. In 2016, the
Democratic Party platform called for prosecuting climate skeptics. These are political ploys which shuts down scientific discussion and free speech, blatantly stifling the Scientific Method.Fourth, they insist the effects will be catastrophic. Carbon
Dioxide (CO2[DC1] ) is plant food. Greenhouses have used it for years to enrich the growth of plants, and NASA
acknowledged back in 2016 that increased CO2 levels are indeed making our world greener today[DC2] .AGW scientists assume that the earth has no natural
negative feedback cycle, and if temperature and CO2 levels go up, there is nothing but human intervention to bring them back down. Yet thousands of years of human history have demonstrated just the opposite; temperatures and CO2 levels have oscillated back and forth.There is no scientific evidence that a warmer earth will be
bad. History demonstrates the opposite. The Minoan, the Roman, and the Medieval
Warm Periods were prosperous times, and the cold periods of the Greek and
European Dark Ages were times of starvation, plague, and the fall of empires.Fifth, despite all this, the AGW’s solution is to send trillions
of US dollars to the United Nations. Call me a cynic, given the UN’s history of
abuse and mismanagement of funds, that they could police the world and manage
the CO2 output of Russia, China, India, etc.Finally, a new
study from big-name economists including Laurence Kotlikoff and Jeffrey Sachs confirms my point: even a small carbon tax today will do just the opposite of what AGW’s claim, causing economic loss to at least two future generations, and possibly more.Yet scratch any AGW proponent and you will find a redistributionist
and a globalist lying beneath. This is why you find so much support for their
position among Democrats. What would Governor
Inslee’s proposed spending of $9 trillion or the Green
New Deal’s proposed spending of $100 trillion mean for our prosperity? What would it mean for our nation’s sovereignty and our personal liberties to transfer authority and control of one third of our economy to the United Nations? They do not care. The AGW hypothesis is a means to their desired end.So, while I do not deny climate change, I do deny the AGW
hypothesis and their solution of throwing trillions of dollars at the problem. Their
solutions would actually harm the environment and damage the health and welfare
of mankind.
Bombshell: Alex Acosta Reportedly Claimed Jeffrey Epstein “Belonged To Intelligence”
This bombshell of a rabbit hole is going to go deep.
To appreciate the significance of what I’m about to share, you really need to go back and read yesterday’s post: The Jeffrey Epstein Rabbit Hole Goes a Lot Deeper Than You Think.
In that piece, I shared many lesser known, but extremely bizarre facts about Jeffrey Epstein and the people around him. I also noted that it appeared his real job was to run a blackmail operation to ensnare some of the most wealthy and powerful people on earth. I alluded to the possibility that he was collecting this priceless information on behalf of a third party, and then just today we learn the following via the Daily Beast:
“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)…
For almost two decades, for some nebulous reason, whether to do with ties to foreign intelligence, his billions of dollars, or his social connections, Epstein, whose alleged sexual sickness and horrific assaults on women without means or ability to protect themselves is well-known in his circle, remained untouchable.
It should be noted the reason I attach credibility to the above is based on who wrote it, Vicky Ward. She has an extensive history of digging into Epstein, and wrote one of the earliest profiles on him back in 2003. As she notes in today’s article:
I spent many months on his trail in 2002 for Vanity Fair and discovered not only that he was not who he claimed to be professionally, but also that he had allegedly assaulted two young sisters, one of whom had been underage at the time. Very bravely, they were prepared to go on the record. They were afraid he’d use all his influence to discredit them—and their fear turned out to be legitimate.
As the article was being readied for publication, Epstein made a visit to the office of Vanity Fair’s then-editor, Graydon Carter, and suddenly the women and their allegations were removed from the article. “He’s sensitive about the young women,” Carter told me at the time. (Editor’s Note: Carter has previously denied this allegation.) He also mentioned he’d finagled a photograph of Epstein in a swimsuit out of the encounter. And there was also some feeble excuse about the article “being stronger as a business story.” (Epstein had also leaned heavily on my ex-husband’s uncle, Conrad Black, to try to exert his influence on me, which was particularly unwelcome, given that Black happened to be my ex-husband’s boss at the time.)
Join me on a journey
Stephen Miller takes The Atlantic on a journey.
Follow along. He saves the best for last.
Hi @PeterBeinart, Join me on a journey won’t you? I’ll save the best for last. pic.twitter.com/OAwbCLlpvH
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
@PeterBeinart Here is a CNN host comparing them to DDay soldiers. Don Lemon did as well. pic.twitter.com/P5xfeutY8n
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
@PeterBeinart And here is an editor from your own magazine doing the same pic.twitter.com/TzeeahFmw3
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
@PeterBeinart But that’s not even close to the best one.. Drumroll or nah?
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
.@PeterBeinart Here’s your boss, and the guy who signed off on your piece, comparing them to DDay soldiers. I hope this was good for you , your editors, your boss, and your clown magazine as it was for me. pic.twitter.com/Q8KQ4kAihQ
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
“No one in the mainstream press is defending Antifa except anchors at the network I appear on and the editors at the magazine I write for.”@PeterBeinart 10/10 take. Great work team.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 7, 2019
“Take back our democracy from special interests,” said the billionaire who donated $90 million to Democrats in 2016 to further his interests.
Let’s take our democracy back from corporations and special interests, and give it to the people––the way it was always intended.
I'm excited to meet you on the campaign trail soon. Join us at https://t.co/jXtstPHDwJ
— Tom Steyer (@TomSteyer) July 9, 2019
CA Progressive Left-wing billionaire Tom Steyer was the #1 top spender in 2014 & 2016 federal elections and #3 overall in 2018. To date, he's spent over $235 MILLION buying high office for Democrats–exclusively Democrats. pic.twitter.com/pLWJqdrCUz
— Soquel by the Creek (@SoquelCreek) July 9, 2019
Steyer also has close ties with another of the biggest spenders in American politics, Service Employees International Union (SEIU). SEIU could supply Steyer with a purple-shirted army of campaign "volunteers." pic.twitter.com/dOo6SnKBYP
— Soquel by the Creek (@SoquelCreek) July 9, 2019
"Take back our democracy from special interests," said the billionaire who donated $90 million to Democrats in 2016 to further his interests. https://t.co/0NgbpocTTN
— Razor (@hale_razor) July 9, 2019
Hockey Coach Informs Players What Will Happen If They Disrespect Canadian or U.S. Flag/Anthem
“We’re Not Woman’s Soccer…”
NSFW. Salty language.
Coach tells players if you’re going to disrespect the national anthem, get the f*ck out pic.twitter.com/YT7IXa7yVO
— Wojciech Pawelczyk 🇵🇱🇺🇸 (@PolishPatriotTM) July 8, 2019
Moscow Property Taxes Expected To Rise 25 Percent Next Year
From the Moscow-Pullman Daily News:
Property owners in Moscow could pay 25 percent more in taxes next year, city officials say.
In a budget workshop Monday at the Moscow City Hall council chambers led by Moscow City Supervisor Gary Riedner, city council members and city administrators discussed a budget proposal that included the hike.
The increase would raise taxes on property owners from $4.49 per $1,000 of assessed property value to $5.63, an increase of about 25 percent. For homeowners in Moscow, who receive a state tax exemption for 50 percent of their property’s value up to $100,000, this means they would pay about $560 annually on a home valued at $200,000 — up from about $450 last year.
The largest chunk of the increase supports the retirement of a $10 million bond, approved by voters in May, to fund the construction of new police station among other items. That bond will be paid over the course of 10 years at $1.1 million annually, and is representative of a 19-percent increase in property tax.
The remaining increase is comprised of two roughly $200,000 increases in the local property tax rate, or a rise worth about 3.5 percent of the current rate for each increase. One is a flat increase to the base property tax rate in Moscow; the other functions exactly the same as the first — increasing city property taxes by about 3.5 percent annually — but comes from a taxing authority that was deferred in previous years and called a “foregone” amount. Page Break
Riedner said forgone money is better described as tax authority accumulated when a municipality declines to collect the full tax increase allowed by the state legislature in a given year.
“They call it foregone or banked — it’s not real money because it’s not levied, it is budgetary authority, that’s all it is,” Riedner said.
He said the amount declined accumulates as a real dollar rate over the years and a municipality has the option to tax for and collect the full rate or a portion of the rate in ensuing years as a kind of indefinite levy.
Moscow rarely accepts annual tax increases and so has the “foregone” authority to raise taxes by nearly $325,000 a year. It has elected to recapture $200,000 of that. Riedner said this will provide a stable fund to support raises planned for Moscow police officers.
“The property tax payments made to the city, which the property owners are going to pay, is going to increase by $200,000 and next year, it will be that same $200,000,” Riedner said. “I’ve got to depend on that money to pay the cops every year because one time funding like a grant — that’s going to run out.”
Riedner said administrators would make revisions and corrections based on suggestions from Monday’s meeting and release the proposal for public view and comment. A public hearing on the budget is scheduled for Aug. 5.
The Junk Food Fight
It’s worth a minute to study the smorgasbord.
