I nominate Suzanna Walters for the most hateful, venomous, vitriolic, and reprehensible op-ed in history of WaPo

NewImage

I posted about Suzanna Danuta Walters’ authoring the “most hateful, venomous, vitriolic, malicious, misguided, despicable, vindictive, unpersuasive and reprehensible op-ed in the history of the Washington Post, and possibly in the history of modern journalism for a mainstream media publication.”

This comment: 

Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies programs don’t belong at universities. Their purpose is advocacy and the creation of ideological mumbo jumbo.

If she weren’t a PhD and tenured, she’d be qualified to serve espressos at Starbucks. 

And Mark J. Perry says it all: 

I hereby nominate Suzanna Danuta Walters (picture above), professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, for authoring the most hateful, venomous, vitriolic, malicious, misguided, despicable, vindictive, unpersuasive and reprehensible op-ed in the history of the Washington Post, and possibly in the history of modern journalism for a mainstream media publication.  The op-ed is titled “Why Can’t We Hate Men?” and is featured prominently on the main editorial page of today’s (Sunday) Washington Post, here’s the “money hate speech quote” (last paragraph):

 So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.

#HateSpeech #SuchaSmallMinority #WithAlmostNoOne #BecauseThisTypeofFeminismIsPureHate

Question 1: Would the Washington Post ever print anything that so persuasively qualifies as pure “hate speech” if it was directed against any other target except men?

Answer: #NotAChance.

Question 2: Is there anybody, especially any feminists, who are publicly supporting Professor Walter’s noxious, anti-male effluvium of hatred and vitriol?

Answer: #ApparentlyNot.

Right-Mind